Skip to main content

CIPR

  • Home
  • About
    • Annual reports
  • People
    • Executives
    • Academics
    • Professional staff
    • Research officers
    • Visitors
      • Past visitors
    • Current PhD students
    • Graduated PhD students
  • Publications
    • Policy Insights: Special Series
    • Commissioned Reports
    • Working Papers
    • Discussion Papers
    • Topical Issues
    • Research Monographs
    • 2011 Census papers
    • 2016 Census papers
    • People on Country
    • Talk, Text and Technology
    • Culture Crisis
    • The Macquarie Atlas of Indigenous Australia
    • Indigenous Futures
    • Information for authors
  • Events
    • Workshops
    • Event series
  • News
  • Students
    • Study with us
  • Research
    • Key research areas
    • Visiting Indigenous Fellowship
    • Past projects
      • Indigenous Researcher-in-Residence
      • Sustainable Indigenous Entrepreneurs
      • Indigenous Population
        • Publications
        • 2011 Lecture Series
      • New Media
        • Western Desert Special Speech Styles Project
      • People On Country
        • Project overview
          • Advisory committee
          • Funding
          • Research partners
          • Research team
        • Project partners
          • Dhimurru
          • Djelk
          • Garawa
          • Waanyi/Garawa
          • Warddeken
          • Yirralka Rangers
          • Yugul Mangi
        • Research outputs
          • Publications
          • Reports
          • Newsletters
          • Project documents
      • Indigenous Governance
        • Publications
        • Annual reports
        • Reports
        • Case studies
        • Newsletters
        • Occasional papers
        • Miscellaneous documents
      • Education Futures
        • Indigenous Justice Workshop
        • Research outputs
        • Research summaries
  • Contact us

Research Spotlight

  • Zero Carbon Energy
    • Publications and Submissions
  • Market value for Indigenous Knowledge
  • Indigenous public servants
  • Urban Indigenous Research Network
    • About
    • People
    • Events
    • News
    • Project & Networks
      • ANU Women in Indigenous Policy and Law Research Network (WIPLRN)
      • ANU Development and Governance Research Network (DGRNET)
      • Reconfiguring New Public Management
        • People
        • NSW survey
    • Publications
    • Contact

Related Sites

  • ANU College of Arts & Social Sciences
  • Research School of Social Sciences
  • Australian National Internships Program

Administrator

Breadcrumb

HomeResearchPublicationsIndigenous Autonomy In Australia: Some Concepts, Issues and Examples
Indigenous autonomy in Australia: Some concepts, issues and examples
Author/editor: Arthur, W
Year published: 2001
Issue no.: 220

Abstract

This paper explores the concept of autonomy as it might apply to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Literature dealing with the concept of autonomy is considered and several analytical approaches are discussed. Principal amongst these are the distinction between corporate autonomy for a people and regional autonomy, whether autonomy might apply to only Indigenous people or to all people in a region, and the possible relationship between political and economic factors. Although autonomy may be considered as a right, the paper takes the view that it is a status which has to be negotiated with the state, and so requires legitimation.

With these principles in mind, the concept of autonomy is discussed at the national level and in four regions: Torres Strait, the Tiwi Islands, the Miwatj region in Arnhem Land, and the Murdi Paaki ATSIC region in New South Wales. These examples suggest that Indigenous people perceive autonomy as something that would apply to largely to Indigenous-specific services; only in Torres Strait is consideration being given to a form of regional autonomy that might apply to issues relating to all of the people in the region. The example of Murdi Paaki in New South Wales suggests that in the more heavily populated regions of the country Indigenous people may well view autonomy in terms of devolving more economic power to the regions within the ambit of the ATSIC system.

In general, the examples suggest that Indigenous views of economic autonomy include increased control over Indigenous-specific funding. The only exception to this is in Torres Strait where one goal is greater Indigenous control of local fisheries. There is a significant point of divergence between Indigenous and government views of the economic aspects of autonomy, with governments considering political autonomy as something that might result in a reduction in welfare costs either through greater regional efficiencies or through increased Indigenous participation in the market economy.

The paper suggests that the concepts of negative and positive autonomy may be useful in the Australia context as they may help illustrate that a particular form of autonomy is possible even when there is continuing economic dependence on the welfare system.

ISBN: 0 7315 2655 4

ISSN:1036 1774

File attachments

AttachmentSize
2001_DP220_0.pdf(380.71 KB)380.71 KB